- HR Insights Today
- Posts
- š§ Why Employees Are Rejecting 360° Reviews
š§ Why Employees Are Rejecting 360° Reviews
Inside: Gen Zās āMicro-Retirementā Trend

Presented by
Happy Sunday!
Today, weāre looking at some major shifts in how companies manage, retain, and even rehire employeesāand not all of it is sitting well with the workforce. Employees are rejecting 360-degree feedback, while Metaās internal āblockā lists are raising concerns about fairness in rehiring practices.
With employees questioning and challenging these policies, how will companies adapt?
This HR leader Tells You Why They Chose SSR
SelectSoftware Reviews (SSR) helps HR professionals cut through the noise by providing expert-vetted recommendations tailored to their needs.
āļøāļøāļøāļøāļø
Everything was super simple. The ability to help connect companies to other HR solutions is much needed in this space. I really appreciate all the help.
Like Caitlyn, thousands of HR professionals trust SelectSoftware Reviews to simplify their HR software search. Get expert recommendations, save time, and find the best-fit solutionāall at no cost to you.
Upcoming in this issue š°
š§ Are Your Mental Health Benefits Actually Working?
š§āš¼ Gen Zās āMicro-Retirementā Trend: A Workplace Revolution or Risk?
š« Metaās Secret āBlockā Lists: Smart Risk Strategy or HR Overreach?
š§ Why Employees Are Rejecting 360-Degree Feedback
š§ Are Your Mental Health Benefits Actually Working?
Iāve always believed mental health benefits are essential, but after reading this, I realized most companies may not be using them effectively. According to a study by Lyra, 90% of employees faced mental health challenges last year, yet many employer-sponsored programsālike traditional EAPsāare underutilized.
Burnout is on the rise again, and itās not just hurting employeesāitās costing businesses in turnover, disability claims, and lost productivity. So, how can companies make real changes?
Key Takeaways from Experts:
š Measure mental health ROI ā Employers should track how many employees engage with care and whether treatment leads to meaningful improvements.
š¢ Fix workplace stressors first ā Overwork, lack of recognition, and unclear job roles are major burnout drivers that benefits alone canāt solve.
š Choose vendors wisely ā Effective mental health providers use data-driven, evidence-based careānot just a check-the-box EAP approach.
šÆ Managers matter most ā Leadership should invest in healthy management practices to reduce uncertainty and excess stress for employees.
TL;DR
Simply providing benefits isnāt enoughāorganizations must measure whether employees are actually improving and address workplace conditions that contribute to mental health challenges.
š§āš¼ Gen Zās āMicro-Retirementā Trend: A Workplace Revolution or Risk?
Iāve always thought of retirement as something you work decades to reachābut for Gen Z, retirement is happening in small doses throughout their careers. Dubbed āmicro-retirement,ā this trend sees young professionals taking extended breaks for personal growth, mental health, and flexibility.
Traditional career ladders? Theyāre opting out. Instead of climbing nonstop, theyāre pressing pauseāand employers are trying to keep up.
Quick Summary:
š Gen Z is rejecting burnout culture ā After watching older generations sacrifice work-life balance, theyāre prioritizing mental health, fulfillment, and flexibility.
ā³ Employers are feeling the shift ā Frequent career breaks raise concerns about workforce continuity and financial stability for young professionals.
š Businesses must adapt ā Companies that embrace sabbaticals, project-based contracts, and flexible policies may gain a competitive edge in hiring and retention.
š The ālearning sabbaticalā solution ā Experts suggest reframing time off as an intentional career strategy to develop new skills and prevent turnover.
TL;DR
Gen Z is redefining career paths by integrating extended breaks or āmicro retirement throughout their working lives, challenging traditional job structures. While this approach prioritizes well-being and personal growth, it also raises concerns about long-term financial stability and career momentum.
š° Latest in HR News
š§āš¼ RTO Incentives: Deloitte ties staff bonuses to office attendance in RTO push
āŖļø Unconscious Bias Training Backfires: Christian ex-Honeywell worker claims bias training violated his religious beliefs
š°ļø Employee Benefits Opportunity: With interest rates drop, HR can offer financial wellness perks
š¤ Agentic AI: Salesforceās head of talent growth and development shares how the tech giant is training its 72,000 employees on agentic AI
š« Metaās Secret āBlockā Lists: Smart Risk Strategy or HR Overreach?
Iāve heard of companies blacklisting employees before, but Metaās large-scale āblockā lists? Unheard of!
According to a Business Insider report, Meta maintains internal systems that prevent some former employeesāincluding high performersāfrom being rehired. While not illegal, the practice shocked industry leaders like former Google HR chief Laszlo Bock, who said heād "never seen a systematic approach like this."
An Overview:
š« Meta tracks āblockā lists internally ā Some laid-off employees, even those with strong records, are permanently ineligible for rehire without explanation.
š”ļø Risk vs. retaliation? ā HR and legal experts say the lists can protect against corporate espionage, but they also raise fairness and transparency concerns.
š Expiration dates suggested ā Experts argue that reassessment policies could prevent unjust, career-limiting decisions and allow for growth.
ā ļø Common but flawed ā Many companies use "do not rehire" flags in HR systems, but they can be misused if not applied with clear policies.
TL;DR
Metaās internal āblockā lists prevent some former employees from being rehired, sparking industry debate. While some HR experts see it as a security measure to protect against leaks, others warn that it could be unfairly applied or misused for retaliation.
š§ Why Employees Are Rejecting 360-Degree Feedback
360-degree feedback is not easy to get right., and now employees say they want out.
A new survey found that 79% of employees would opt out of 360-degree feedback reviews, fearing they are being misused for office politics and personal grudges. While the system is meant to offer balanced insights, it seems to be creating stress, workplace drama, and even decreased productivity.
Key Insights:
š 360-degree feedback is widely used but unpopular ā 71% of organizations use it, yet more than 3 in 4 employees want to opt out due to misuse concerns.
š Office politics and bias are major issues ā 48% believe the process amplifies office politics, and nearly 80% suspect feedback is sometimes used for personal revenge.
š¬ Anonymity isnāt always helpful ā While intended to foster honesty, 28% say anonymous feedback leads to vague, unhelpful, or even passive-aggressive comments.
š§ How to fix it ā Experts suggest carefully selecting raters, ensuring transparency, and providing follow-ups to make feedback more meaningful and less toxic.
TL;DR
While 360-degree feedback is designed to help employees grow, many feel itās being misused for office politics and retaliation. This leads to strained workplace relationships, stress, and lower productivity. Companies need to refine how they administer feedbackāchoosing unbiased raters, setting clear expectations, and ensuring follow-upsāto make the process fair and constructive.
PS - Do check out SSR's free HR software matching service. As you know, buying HR software can be stressful and time-consuming. SSR helps you find the right HR software at the right price, saving you both time and money!
How was today's edition?Rate this newsletter. |

Sophia Bennett
Editor-in-Chief
HR Insights Today




