🀝 Skills are up. Trust just tanked.

Something about new grads has employers uneasy.

Presented by

For the past few years, employer complaints about new graduates have focused on skills: not enough AI fluency, not enough data literacy, not enough hands-on experience. T

his year's Corporate Recruiters Survey from GMAC surfaces a different complaint, and it has nothing to do with technical readiness.

COMING UP

  • πŸŽ“ GMAC's 2026 survey: 1 in 3 employers have already replaced at least some entry-level roles with AI

  • πŸ—ΊοΈ Federal Reserve data show remote work rates ranging from the single digits to over 20% depending on the state

  • ⏳ McKinsey now expects half of today's work activities to be automatable a decade sooner than it first projected

  • πŸ€– iHire's 2026 survey: 44% of workers who see AI hurting their culture say it's because colleagues are being replaced

Picking HR software shouldn't mean wading through a hundred vendor websites on your own. 😣 

SSR's free HR software matching service, matches your team with HR software that makes sense, not just what's popular. Out of hundreds of options, you get a narrowed-down list of 2-3 vetted tools you can start with.

Bonus: right now, complete intro calls with your matched vendors and get a $100 Amazon gift card as a thank you from the SSR team. (T&C apply)

 πŸ“° Latest in HR News

πŸ€– AI Is The Wildcard In This Year's Toxic Workplace Report

Workplace toxicity research usually points straight at leadership, and iHire's 2026 survey does too. But this year's data also captures something newer: how AI is starting to shape the same culture problems leadership has always driven.

The verdict from employees isn't settled, and the split says as much about how AI gets rolled out as it does about the technology itself.

What's your honest take on AI's effect on workplace culture so far?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Split Verdict On AI And Culture: Here's Why:

  • 😐 33.8% of employees say AI has had a neutral effect on their company's culture, the single largest response in the survey. Ambivalence, not alarm, is still the dominant employee reaction to AI in the workplace.

  • πŸ«‚ Among employees who see AI's cultural impact as negative, 52.6% point to the human element being removed from colleague interactions as the main reason. Lost connection, not lost jobs, is the top complaint among AI skeptics.

  • πŸ“‰ 44.0% of those same AI skeptics say employees are being replaced by AI outright. Job security fears are showing up specifically among the minority who already view AI negatively, not the workforce at large.

  • πŸ•΅οΈ 37.9% cite leaders having unrealistic expectations for output because of AI, and 31.9% say leaders use AI to micromanage or surveil employees. When AI amplifies toxicity, management behavior is usually the mechanism.

πŸ—ΊοΈ Remote Work Looks Nothing Alike From State To State

Two years into the return-to-office push, the national remote work rate has barely moved. But that stability hides a much bigger story underneath it: places like Washington D.C., Massachusetts, and Colorado look nothing like Mississippi, Alabama, and Arkansas when it comes to how much of the workforce works from home.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis's latest analysis of Census data shows just how uneven that flexibility landscape has become, and how misleading a single national number can be for hiring and policy decisions.

4 Numbers Behind America's Remote Work Map:

  • πŸ“Š Nationally, about 22% of U.S. workers were working from home at least some of the time in 2025, down just under 1 percentage point from 2024. A number this stable can still hide sharp swings happening underneath it by state and sector.

  • πŸ”οΈ Colorado ranks second in the country for its share of fully remote workers but only seventh for hybrid workers. A state's overall remote work rate can mask very different arrangements underneath it.

  • 🧭 In the Ninth Federal Reserve District, Minnesota has the highest share of hybrid workers while Montana has the highest share of fully remote workers. Neighboring states in the same region can have very different flexibility profiles.

  • πŸ›οΈ The remote work rate within public administration dropped 6 percentage points from 2024 to 2025, and the information sector's rate fell about 5 points, tied to specific federal and state return-to-office mandates. Sector and policy-driven declines, not a broad shift away from remote work, explain most of the recent movement.

In this webinar, we're digging into what scalable HR infrastructure actually looks like...and how to build it before you desperately need it.

From disconnected systems and patchwork processes to the hidden risks that come with rapid growth, we'll explore what it takes to set your HR function up to support the business at every stage, not just the one you're in right now.

⏳ 2045: McKinsey's New Deadline For Automating Half Of Today's Work

Generative AI's economic promise gets most of the headlines, but the more consequential number in McKinsey's research might be the one about time. The firm has compressed its own automation forecast, and that compression changes how much runway HR actually has to prepare the workforce for what's coming.

Every year an organization waits to build reskilling infrastructure is a year taken directly out of that shrinking window.

What HR Needs To Know About The New Automation Math:

  • πŸ’° Generative AI could add $2.6 trillion to $4.4 trillion in value annually across the 63 use cases McKinsey analyzed, roughly equivalent to the entire GDP of the United Kingdom. That scale of opportunity is exactly why competitors won't wait to capture it.

  • βš™οΈ Current technology could automate work activities that absorb 60% to 70% of employees' time today, up from a previous estimate of about half. The addressable share of nearly every job just got bigger, not just the AI-adjacent ones.

  • πŸ—£οΈ Generative AI's jump in capability comes largely from understanding natural language, which accounts for 25% of total work time and is concentrated in higher-wage, higher-education occupations. Knowledge work, not manual labor, is absorbing the sharpest edge of this shift.

  • πŸ“ˆ Combining generative AI with other technologies could add 0.2 to 3.3 percentage points annually to productivity growth, but McKinsey is explicit that this depends on managing worker transitions and reskilling. The productivity case for AI runs directly through HR, not around it.

🀝 Employers Say This Year's Grads Are Harder To Trust On The Basics

Confidence in graduate management education hit an all-time high this year. Confidence in the graduates themselves did not follow the same path.

GMAC's 2026 Corporate Recruiters Survey found a real gap between how much employers value a business degree and how much they trust the person holding it to show up, follow through, and act like a professional once hired.

The Professionalism Gap, In 4 Numbers:

  • πŸ’― 100% of employers expressed at least some confidence in graduate management education in 2026, up from 99% in 2025. Trust in the degree itself has never been higher, even as trust in graduates' workplace conduct slips.

  • 🏒 Almost two-thirds of Fortune 500 employers agreed today's graduates are as professional as those from previous years, compared with just 43% at non-Fortune 500 companies. Smaller and mid-size employers may be absorbing more of the professionalism gap than brand-name recruiters.

  • πŸ’» Technology employers remain the most satisfied with new graduates' workplace etiquette, while consulting and manufacturing employers are the least satisfied. Onboarding expectations may need to flex by industry, not just by role.

  • 🌎 Employers in the Americas remain the least satisfied with new graduates' professionalism, while employers in Asia are among the most convinced. A single onboarding playbook may not travel well across a global workforce.

Thanks for reading HR Insights Today. There’s always something changing in HR. New tools, new trends, new chaos. Not everyone to keep up with everything happening in HR so we do it for you. Each edition brings a quick, curated mix of news, resources, and learnings to help you stay updated.

BTW: This newsletter is powered by SelectSoftware Reviews. Their HR software matching service is a free resource HR pros can use to compare tools, dodge bad software, and make confident decisions (without spending hours researching). Worth checking out if you’re exploring vendors. Learn more about how it works.

How was today's edition?

Rate this newsletter.

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Sophia Bennett | Editor-in-Chief | HR Insights Today